SendGrid: Improve esp_extra["personalizations"] handling.

Allow merging `esp_extra["personalizations"]` dict into other
message-derived personalizations.

(See comments in #120)
This commit is contained in:
medmunds
2018-08-27 11:10:48 -07:00
parent dbca13243f
commit 382ebf249c
4 changed files with 48 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ Features
* **SendGrid:** Support both new "dynamic" and original "legacy" transactional * **SendGrid:** Support both new "dynamic" and original "legacy" transactional
templates. (See templates. (See
`docs <https://anymail.readthedocs.io/en/latest/esps/sendgrid/#sendgrid-templates>`__.) `docs <https://anymail.readthedocs.io/en/latest/esps/sendgrid/#sendgrid-templates>`__.)
* **SendGrid:** Allow merging `esp_extra["personalizations"]` dict into other message-derived
personalizations. (See
`docs <https://anymail.readthedocs.io/en/latest/esps/sendgrid/#sendgrid-esp-extra>`__.)
v4.0 v4.0

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
import uuid import uuid
from collections import Mapping
from email.utils import quote as rfc822_quote from email.utils import quote as rfc822_quote
import warnings import warnings
@@ -171,7 +172,7 @@ class SendGridPayload(RequestsPayload):
pass # no merge_data for this recipient pass # no merge_data for this recipient
self.data["personalizations"].append(personalization) self.data["personalizations"].append(personalization)
if self.merge_field_format is None and all(field.isalnum() for field in all_fields): if self.merge_field_format is None and len(all_fields) and all(field.isalnum() for field in all_fields):
warnings.warn( warnings.warn(
"Your SendGrid merge fields don't seem to have delimiters, " "Your SendGrid merge fields don't seem to have delimiters, "
"which can cause unexpected results with Anymail's merge_data. " "which can cause unexpected results with Anymail's merge_data. "
@@ -347,6 +348,10 @@ class SendGridPayload(RequestsPayload):
def set_esp_extra(self, extra): def set_esp_extra(self, extra):
self.merge_field_format = extra.pop("merge_field_format", self.merge_field_format) self.merge_field_format = extra.pop("merge_field_format", self.merge_field_format)
self.use_dynamic_template = extra.pop("use_dynamic_template", self.use_dynamic_template) self.use_dynamic_template = extra.pop("use_dynamic_template", self.use_dynamic_template)
if isinstance(extra.get("personalizations", None), Mapping):
# merge personalizations *dict* into other message personalizations
assert len(self.data["personalizations"]) == 1
self.data["personalizations"][0].update(extra.pop("personalizations"))
if "x-smtpapi" in extra: if "x-smtpapi" in extra:
raise AnymailConfigurationError( raise AnymailConfigurationError(
"You are attempting to use SendGrid v2 API-style x-smtpapi params " "You are attempting to use SendGrid v2 API-style x-smtpapi params "

View File

@@ -123,6 +123,12 @@ Your :attr:`esp_extra` dict will be deeply merged into the
parameters Anymail has constructed for the send, with `esp_extra` parameters Anymail has constructed for the send, with `esp_extra`
having precedence in conflicts. having precedence in conflicts.
Anymail has special handling for `esp_extra["personalizations"]`. If that value
is a `dict`, Anymail will merge that personalizations dict into the personalizations
for each message recipient. (If you pass a `list`, that will override the
personalizations Anymail normally constructs from the message, and you will need to
specify each recipient in the personalizations list yourself.)
Example: Example:
.. code-block:: python .. code-block:: python
@@ -140,6 +146,11 @@ Example:
"substitution_tag": "%%OPEN_TRACKING_PIXEL%%", "substitution_tag": "%%OPEN_TRACKING_PIXEL%%",
}, },
}, },
# Because "personalizations" is a dict, Anymail will merge "future_feature"
# into the SendGrid personalizations array for each message recipient
"personalizations": {
"future_feature": {"future": "data"},
},
} }

View File

@@ -627,6 +627,34 @@ class SendGridBackendAnymailFeatureTests(SendGridBackendMockAPITestCase):
self.assertEqual(data['categories'], ["tag"]) self.assertEqual(data['categories'], ["tag"])
self.assertEqual(data['tracking_settings']['click_tracking'], {'enable': True}) self.assertEqual(data['tracking_settings']['click_tracking'], {'enable': True})
def test_esp_extra_pesonalizations(self):
self.message.to = ["First recipient <first@example.com>", "second@example.com"]
self.message.merge_data = {} # force separate messages for each 'to'
# esp_extra['personalizations'] dict merges with message-derived personalizations
self.message.esp_extra = {
"personalizations": {"future_feature": "works"}}
self.message.send()
data = self.get_api_call_json()
self.assertEqual(data['personalizations'], [
{'to': [{'email': 'first@example.com', 'name': '"First recipient"'}],
'future_feature': "works"},
{'to': [{'email': 'second@example.com'}],
'future_feature': "works"}, # merged into *every* recipient
])
# but esp_extra['personalizations'] list just overrides entire personalizations
# (for backwards compatibility)
self.message.esp_extra = {
"personalizations": [{"to": [{"email": "custom@example.com"}],
"future_feature": "works"}]}
self.message.send()
data = self.get_api_call_json()
self.assertEqual(data['personalizations'], [
{'to': [{'email': 'custom@example.com'}],
'future_feature': "works"},
])
# noinspection PyUnresolvedReferences # noinspection PyUnresolvedReferences
def test_send_attaches_anymail_status(self): def test_send_attaches_anymail_status(self):
""" The anymail_status should be attached to the message when it is sent """ """ The anymail_status should be attached to the message when it is sent """