Switch from Mailjet's older v3.0 Send API to the newer v3.1 version.
This is a breaking change for code using the Mailjet backend and:
* Using `esp_extra`, which must be updated to the new API format
* Using multiple `reply_to` addresses, which the v3.1 API doesn't allow
Closes#81
Support merge_metadata in Mailgun, Mailjet, Mandrill, Postmark,
SparkPost, and Test backends. (SendGrid covered in earlier PR.)
Also:
* Add `merge_metadata` to AnymailMessage, AnymailMessageMixin
* Add `is_batch()` logic to BasePayload, for consistent handling
* Docs
Note: Mailjet implementation switches *all* batch sending from their
"Recipients" field to to the "Messages" array bulk sending option.
This allows an independent payload for each batch recipient.
In addition to supporting merge_metadata, this also removes the
prior limitation on mixing Cc/Bcc with merge_data.
Closes#141.
New EmailMessage attribute `envelope_sender` controls ESP's sender,
sending domain, or return path where supported:
* Mailgun: overrides SENDER_DOMAIN on individual message
(domain portion only)
* Mailjet: becomes `Sender` API param
* Mandrill: becomes `return_path_domain` API param
(domain portion only)
* SparkPost: becomes `return_path` API param
* Other ESPs: not believed to be supported
Also support undocumented Django SMTP backend behavior, where envelope
sender is given by `message.from_email` when
`message.extra_headers["From"]` is set. Fixes#91.
This fixes a low severity security issue affecting Anymail v0.2--v1.3.
Django error reporting includes the value of your Anymail
WEBHOOK_AUTHORIZATION setting. In a properly-configured deployment,
this should not be cause for concern. But if you have somehow exposed
your Django error reports (e.g., by mis-deploying with DEBUG=True or by
sending error reports through insecure channels), anyone who gains
access to those reports could discover your webhook shared secret. An
attacker could use this to post fabricated or malicious Anymail
tracking/inbound events to your app, if you are using those Anymail
features.
The fix renames Anymail's webhook shared secret setting so that
Django's error reporting mechanism will [sanitize][0] it.
If you are using Anymail's event tracking and/or inbound webhooks, you
should upgrade to this release and change "WEBHOOK_AUTHORIZATION" to
"WEBHOOK_SECRET" in the ANYMAIL section of your settings.py. You may
also want to [rotate the shared secret][1] value, particularly if you
have ever exposed your Django error reports to untrusted individuals.
If you are only using Anymail's EmailBackends for sending email and
have not set up Anymail's webhooks, this issue does not affect you.
The old WEBHOOK_AUTHORIZATION setting is still allowed in this release,
but will issue a system-check warning when running most Django
management commands. It will be removed completely in a near-future
release, as a breaking change.
Thanks to Charlie DeTar (@yourcelf) for responsibly reporting this
security issue through private channels.
[0]: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/stable/ref/settings/#debug
[1]: https://anymail.readthedocs.io/en/1.4/tips/securing_webhooks/#use-a-shared-authorization-secret
