# ThrillWiki Moderation Guide

## Overview

This guide covers the moderation systems in ThrillWiki, including:
- Content edit submissions
- Photo submissions
- User reviews
- Report handling
- Moderation best practices

## Moderation Dashboard

Access the moderation dashboard at `/moderation/` to view:
- Pending edit submissions
- Photo submissions awaiting review
- Reported content
- Moderation statistics

## Content Edit Moderation

### Edit Submission Types
1. **Edit Existing**
   - Changes to existing parks, rides, or other content
   - Shows diff of proposed changes
   - Requires source verification

2. **Create New**
   - New park, ride, or content submissions
   - Requires complete information
   - Needs source verification

### Review Process
1. **Initial Assessment**
   - Check submission completeness
   - Verify sources
   - Review user history

2. **Status Options**
   ```python
   STATUS_CHOICES = [
       ('NEW', 'New'),
       ('APPROVED', 'Approved'),
       ('REJECTED', 'Rejected'),
       ('ESCALATED', 'Escalated'),
   ]
   ```

3. **Actions**
   - Approve: Apply changes after verification
   - Reject: Provide clear reason
   - Escalate: For complex cases needing admin review

### Approval Guidelines
- Verify information accuracy
- Check reliable sources
- Ensure formatting consistency
- Review for completeness

### Rejection Guidelines
- Provide clear explanation
- Reference guidelines
- Suggest improvements
- Be constructive

## Photo Moderation

### Submission Types
- Park photos
- Ride photos
- Attraction photos
- Historical photos

### Review Process
1. **Initial Check**
   - Image quality
   - Appropriate content
   - Copyright concerns
   - Metadata accuracy

2. **Status Options**
   ```python
   STATUS_CHOICES = [
       ('NEW', 'New'),
       ('APPROVED', 'Approved'),
       ('REJECTED', 'Rejected'),
       ('AUTO_APPROVED', 'Auto Approved'),
   ]
   ```

3. **Actions**
   - Approve: Add to main gallery
   - Reject: Explain issues
   - Auto-approve: For trusted users

### Photo Guidelines
- Minimum resolution requirements
- No watermarks
- Clear and focused
- Appropriate content
- Proper attribution

## Review Moderation

### Review Components
- Rating (1-10)
- Written content
- Visit date
- Optional photos

### Moderation Criteria
1. **Content Standards**
   - Constructive feedback
   - No personal attacks
   - Family-friendly language
   - Factual accuracy

2. **Rating Consistency**
   - Check against written content
   - Compare with average ratings
   - Look for rating abuse

3. **Photo Guidelines**
   - Relevant to review
   - Appropriate content
   - Quality standards

### Report Handling
1. **Review Reports**
   - Assess reported content
   - Check reporter history
   - Verify claims

2. **Actions**
   - Remove inappropriate content
   - Edit/update if needed
   - Notify users
   - Document actions

## Best Practices

### General Guidelines
1. **Consistency**
   - Follow established guidelines
   - Apply rules uniformly
   - Document decisions

2. **Communication**
   - Clear explanations
   - Professional tone
   - Constructive feedback

3. **Escalation**
   - Know when to escalate
   - Document complex cases
   - Seek admin input

### Quality Control
1. **Content Standards**
   - Accuracy
   - Completeness
   - Formatting
   - Source verification

2. **User Management**
   - Track user history
   - Identify trusted contributors
   - Handle problem users

3. **Documentation**
   - Record decisions
   - Note special cases
   - Track patterns

## Moderation Tools

### Edit Submission Tools
```python
def approve(self, user):
    """Approve and apply changes"""
    # Validates and applies changes
    # Updates status
    # Records moderator action

def reject(self, user):
    """Reject submission"""
    # Updates status
    # Records moderator action
    # Notifies user

def escalate(self, user):
    """Escalate to admin"""
    # Marks for admin review
    # Records moderator action
```

### Photo Submission Tools
```python
def approve(self, moderator, notes=''):
    """Approve photo"""
    # Moves to main gallery
    # Updates status
    # Records approval

def reject(self, moderator, notes):
    """Reject photo"""
    # Updates status
    # Records rejection reason
    # Notifies user
```

## Special Cases

### Content Disputes
1. **Handling Conflicts**
   - Review all perspectives
   - Check reliable sources
   - Document decisions
   - Consider escalation

2. **Resolution Process**
   - Gather evidence
   - Consult experts if needed
   - Make documented decision
   - Communicate clearly

### Emergency Situations
1. **Immediate Action Needed**
   - Inappropriate content
   - Copyright violations
   - Personal information
   - Harmful content

2. **Response Protocol**
   - Remove content immediately
   - Document action taken
   - Notify administrators
   - Follow up as needed

## Moderation Workflow

1. **Daily Tasks**
   - Review new submissions
   - Check reported content
   - Handle escalations
   - Update documentation

2. **Weekly Tasks**
   - Review moderation patterns
   - Check for recurring issues
   - Update guidelines if needed
   - Team communication

3. **Monthly Tasks**
   - Review statistics
   - Assess guidelines
   - Plan improvements
   - Team training

## Resources

### Reference Materials
- Content guidelines
- Photo standards
- Review policies
- Escalation procedures

### Support Channels
- Admin contact information
- Team communication
- Emergency procedures
- Legal resources

## Training and Development

1. **New Moderator Training**
   - Platform overview
   - Tools introduction
   - Guidelines review
   - Supervised practice

2. **Ongoing Development**
   - Regular updates
   - Case studies
   - Best practices
   - Team feedback

## Conclusion

Effective moderation is crucial for maintaining ThrillWiki's quality and community. Follow these guidelines consistently while using good judgment for special cases. Document decisions and seek help when needed.