mirror of
https://github.com/pacnpal/thrillwiki_django_no_react.git
synced 2025-12-20 16:11:08 -05:00
- Add complete backend/ directory with full Django application - Add frontend/ directory with Vite + TypeScript setup ready for Next.js - Add comprehensive shared/ directory with: - Complete documentation and memory-bank archives - Media files and avatars (letters, park/ride images) - Deployment scripts and automation tools - Shared types and utilities - Add architecture/ directory with migration guides - Configure pnpm workspace for monorepo development - Update .gitignore to exclude .django_tailwind_cli/ build artifacts - Preserve all historical documentation in shared/docs/memory-bank/ - Set up proper structure for full-stack development with shared resources
3.1 KiB
3.1 KiB
Comprehensive Card Layout Testing Plan
Date: June 28, 2025, 1:22 PM
Task: Comprehensive testing of card layout balance across all ThrillWiki pages and scenarios
Status: INITIATED
Context: User questioning whether layouts are "always balanced" - need to verify beyond Cedar Point
Testing Scope
1. Multi-Page Layout Testing
- Homepage: Stats section across different screen sizes
- Multiple Park Detail Pages: Test parks with varying data amounts
- Ride Detail Pages: Layout consistency verification
- Company/Manufacturer Detail Pages: Balance testing
- Edge Cases: Missing data, varying content lengths
2. Screen Size Testing Matrix
- 320px: Mobile portrait (smallest)
- 480px: Mobile landscape
- 768px: Tablet portrait (critical breakpoint)
- 1024px: Tablet landscape/small desktop
- 1280px: Desktop standard
- 1440px: Large desktop
3. Content Variation Testing
- Parks with missing owner information
- Parks with very long names/descriptions
- Rides with incomplete data sets
- Pages with fewer than expected cards
- Pages with more cards than typical
4. Specific Balance Issues to Check
- Card spacing consistency
- Awkward wrapping scenarios
- Varying content length handling
- White space issues
- Layout jump detection
Testing Methodology
Browser Testing Approach
- Use browser developer tools for precise breakpoint testing
- Navigate to various page types systematically
- Document any problematic layouts with screenshots
- Record specific pages and screen sizes where issues occur
Success Criteria
- Layouts confirmed balanced across ALL page types
- No white space issues at any breakpoint
- Consistent responsive behavior regardless of content
- Any remaining issues clearly documented
Documentation Requirements
- Record both successful and problematic layouts
- Provide specific examples of any issues found
- Update memory bank with comprehensive results
- Signal completion with detailed findings
Test Execution Plan
Phase 1: Homepage Testing
- Test stats section at all breakpoints
- Verify 3-card layout consistency
Phase 2: Park Detail Pages
- Test multiple parks beyond Cedar Point
- Focus on parks with varying data amounts
- Check for missing data scenarios
Phase 3: Ride Detail Pages
- Test rides with different data completeness
- Check layout consistency across ride types
Phase 4: Company Detail Pages
- Test manufacturer pages
- Check for layout balance issues
Phase 5: Edge Case Testing
- Long content scenarios
- Missing data scenarios
- Unusual content amounts
Phase 6: Cross-Breakpoint Analysis
- Verify smooth transitions
- Check for layout jumps
- Document any inconsistencies
Expected Outcomes
If Layouts Are Balanced
- Document comprehensive verification
- Confirm fixes are working universally
- Update memory bank with success confirmation
If Issues Found
- Document specific problematic scenarios
- Identify patterns in layout inconsistencies
- Note breakpoints where issues occur
- Provide recommendations for fixes
Testing initiated: June 28, 2025, 1:22 PM
Next step: Begin systematic browser testing