pacnpal/thrillwiki_laravel
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/pacnpal/thrillwiki_laravel.git synced 2025-12-20 06:31:10 -05:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat: create designers table and update Park model to use Operator for ownership

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
pacnpal
2025-03-23 15:13:03 -04:00
parent ea7af68d99
commit 8eac13d51b
11 changed files with 1312 additions and 623 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

143
memory-bank/decisionLog.md
View File

@@ -1,134 +1,23 @@
# Decision Log
## [2025-02-26] - Documentation System Enhancement
## 2025-03-23 - Temporary Park Owner Relationship
**Context:** The Park model had an undefined relationship with Company model, which is part of the companies module that hasn't been implemented yet. This was causing errors when trying to access the operator relationship.
### Handoffs System Integration
**Context:** Discovered valuable documentation patterns in RooCode-Tips-Tricks that could enhance our current memory bank system, particularly for managing extended development sessions and preserving detailed context.
**Decision:** Temporarily use the Operator model for both operator() and owner() relationships until the Company model is implemented.
**Decision:** Integrate the Handoffs System alongside our Memory Bank, implementing:
1. Sequential handoff documents for daily development progress
2. Milestone summaries for completed project phases
3. Structured handoff directory organization
4. Clear documentation of context transitions
**Rationale:**
1. Complements Memory Bank with chronological development history
2. Preserves detailed context without summarization loss
3. Enables selective context loading for optimal performance
4. Provides clear project timeline documentation
5. Facilitates clean context switches for better problem-solving
**Rationale:**
- The companies module is listed in the project structure but not yet implemented
- Parks need a working owner relationship for current functionality
- Operator model provides similar functionality for now
**Implementation:**
1. Create handoffs/ directory structure:
- 0-instructions/ for system documentation
- Numbered milestone directories
- Sequential handoff documents
2. Maintain both systems in parallel:
- Memory Bank for active project state
- Handoffs for historical context and transitions
3. Document clear guidelines for when to create:
- Handoffs (after significant progress)
- Milestones (after 3-5 handoffs)
1. Added operator() relationship to Park model
2. Temporarily mapped owner() relationship to use Operator model
3. Added @deprecated tag to owner() relationship to indicate it's temporary
4. Added Operator model import
## [2025-02-26] - Implementation Priority Structure
### Core Implementation Order
**Context:** Need to establish a clear order for implementing remaining features while maintaining system stability and feature parity.
**Decision:** Implement features in the following priority order:
1. Filament Admin Interface
2. History Tracking System
3. Email Service Foundation
4. Companies Module
5. Analytics System
6. Wiki System
**Rationale:**
1. Admin interface is critical for system management and moderation
2. History tracking is required for audit trails and wiki functionality
3. Email service enables notifications and user communication
4. Each subsequent system builds on the previous components
**Implementation:**
- Start with Filament admin setup
- Implement history tracking early
- Build email service incrementally
- Add remaining features in order
### Technical Dependencies
**Context:** Need to manage dependencies between different system components effectively.
**Decision:** Established clear dependency chains:
- History tracking before wiki system
- Admin interface before moderation tools
- Email service before advanced notifications
- Analytics after core tracking systems
**Rationale:**
1. Prevents blocking dependencies
2. Ensures stable foundation
3. Allows incremental testing
4. Maintains clear development path
**Implementation:**
- Document dependencies in technical specs
- Create staged implementation plan
- Set up testing frameworks early
- Monitor inter-component dependencies
## [2025-02-25] - Search and Autocomplete Implementation
### Search Component Enhancement
**Context:** Need to implement autocomplete functionality while maintaining feature parity with Django implementation.
**Decision:** Created a separate AutocompleteComponent to handle suggestions and integrated it with the existing SearchComponent using Livewire events.
**Rationale:**
1. Separation of concerns - keeping autocomplete logic isolated
2. Reusability - component can be used in other search contexts
3. Maintainability - easier to test and modify each component independently
4. Performance - can optimize suggestion queries separately from main search
**Implementation:**
- Created AutocompleteComponent for suggestions
- Used Alpine.js for keyboard navigation
- Integrated with SearchComponent via Livewire events
- Maintained existing search functionality
- Added real-time filtering with debounce
### Technology Choices
**Context:** Need to implement interactive search features without adding JavaScript dependencies.
**Decision:** Used Livewire with Alpine.js (included by default) for all interactive features.
**Rationale:**
1. Follows project requirement to avoid additional JavaScript dependencies
2. Alpine.js comes with Livewire, so no extra setup needed
3. Provides necessary interactivity without compromising simplicity
4. Maintains consistent Laravel/Livewire architecture
**Implementation:**
- Used Livewire for component communication
- Leveraged Alpine.js for keyboard navigation
- Implemented real-time updates with wire:model.live
- Added debounce for performance optimization
### Component Communication
**Context:** Need to handle communication between AutocompleteComponent and SearchComponent.
**Decision:** Used Livewire events for component communication and state synchronization.
**Rationale:**
1. Events provide loose coupling between components
2. Maintains Livewire's reactive nature
3. Easy to debug and extend
4. Standard Laravel/Livewire pattern
**Implementation:**
- Added suggestion-selected event
- Implemented event handler in SearchComponent
- Synchronized search state between components
- Added proper event parameters (id, text)
**Future Work:**
- Implement companies module
- Create proper Company model
- Update owner() relationship to use Company model
- Migrate any existing owner data from Operator to Company