mirror of
https://github.com/pacnpal/thrillwiki_django_no_react.git
synced 2025-12-20 08:51:09 -05:00
751cd86a31
- Implemented OperatorListView and OperatorDetailView for managing operators. - Created corresponding templates for operator listing and detail views. - Added PropertyOwnerListView and PropertyOwnerDetailView for managing property owners. - Developed templates for property owner listing and detail views. - Established relationships between parks and operators, and parks and property owners in the models. - Created migrations to reflect the new relationships and fields in the database. - Added admin interfaces for PropertyOwner management. - Implemented tests for operators and property owners.
173 lines
6.1 KiB
Markdown
173 lines
6.1 KiB
Markdown
# Company Migration Analysis - Complete Codebase Assessment
|
|
|
|
**Date**: 2025-07-04
|
|
**Status**: ✅ ANALYSIS COMPLETE
|
|
**Risk Level**: 🔴 HIGH (300+ references, complex dependencies)
|
|
**Next Phase**: Documentation → Implementation → Testing
|
|
|
|
## Executive Summary
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive analysis of the ThrillWiki Django codebase has identified **300+ company references** across the entire application. The company entity is deeply integrated throughout the system, requiring a carefully orchestrated migration to replace it with a new relationship structure (Operators, PropertyOwners, Manufacturers, Designers).
|
|
|
|
## Analysis Findings Overview
|
|
|
|
### Total Impact Assessment
|
|
- **300+ Company References** found across entire codebase
|
|
- **Critical Dependencies** in core models (parks, rides)
|
|
- **Complex Integration** with pghistory tracking system
|
|
- **Extensive Template Usage** across 6+ template files
|
|
- **Comprehensive Test Coverage** requiring updates (429 lines)
|
|
- **URL Pattern Dependencies** across 22 endpoints
|
|
|
|
## Detailed Breakdown by Component
|
|
|
|
### 1. Models & Database Schema
|
|
**Location**: `companies/models.py`, `parks/models.py:57`, `rides/models.py:173`
|
|
|
|
#### Critical Dependencies Identified:
|
|
- **Parks Model** (`parks/models.py:57`): Foreign key relationship to Company.owner
|
|
- **Rides Model** (`rides/models.py:173`): Foreign key relationship to Company (manufacturer)
|
|
- **Company Model**: Core entity with multiple relationships and pghistory integration
|
|
|
|
#### Database Schema Impact:
|
|
- Foreign key constraints across multiple tables
|
|
- pghistory tracking tables requiring migration
|
|
- Potential data integrity concerns during transition
|
|
|
|
### 2. URL Patterns & Routing
|
|
**Location**: `companies/urls.py`
|
|
|
|
#### 22 URL Patterns Identified:
|
|
- Company list/detail views
|
|
- Company creation/editing endpoints
|
|
- Company search and filtering
|
|
- Company-related API endpoints
|
|
- Admin interface routing
|
|
- Company profile management
|
|
|
|
### 3. Templates & Frontend
|
|
**Location**: `templates/companies/`, cross-references in other templates
|
|
|
|
#### 6 Company Templates + Cross-References:
|
|
- Company detail pages
|
|
- Company listing pages
|
|
- Company creation/editing forms
|
|
- Company search interfaces
|
|
- Company profile components
|
|
- Cross-references in park/ride templates
|
|
|
|
### 4. Test Coverage
|
|
**Location**: `companies/tests.py`
|
|
|
|
#### 429 Lines of Test Code:
|
|
- Model validation tests
|
|
- View functionality tests
|
|
- Form validation tests
|
|
- API endpoint tests
|
|
- Integration tests with parks/rides
|
|
- pghistory tracking tests
|
|
|
|
### 5. Configuration & Settings
|
|
**Locations**: Various configuration files
|
|
|
|
#### Integration Points:
|
|
- Django admin configuration
|
|
- Search indexing configuration
|
|
- Signal handlers
|
|
- Middleware dependencies
|
|
- Template context processors
|
|
|
|
## pghistory Integration Complexity
|
|
|
|
### Historical Data Tracking
|
|
- Company changes tracked in pghistory tables
|
|
- Historical relationships with parks/rides preserved
|
|
- Migration must maintain historical data integrity
|
|
- Complex data migration required for historical records
|
|
|
|
### Risk Assessment
|
|
- **Data Loss Risk**: HIGH - Historical tracking data could be lost
|
|
- **Integrity Risk**: HIGH - Foreign key relationships in historical data
|
|
- **Performance Risk**: MEDIUM - Large historical datasets to migrate
|
|
|
|
## New Relationship Structure Analysis
|
|
|
|
### Target Architecture
|
|
```
|
|
Rides → Parks (required, exists)
|
|
Rides → Manufacturers (optional, rename current company relationship)
|
|
Rides → Designers (optional, exists)
|
|
Parks → Operators (required, replace Company.owner)
|
|
Parks → PropertyOwners (optional, new concept)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Key Relationship Changes
|
|
1. **Company.owner → Operators**: Direct replacement for park ownership
|
|
2. **Company (manufacturer) → Manufacturers**: Rename existing ride relationship
|
|
3. **PropertyOwners**: New optional relationship for parks (usually same as Operators)
|
|
4. **Designers**: Existing relationship, no changes required
|
|
|
|
## Critical Migration Challenges
|
|
|
|
### 1. Data Preservation
|
|
- **300+ company records** need proper categorization
|
|
- **Historical data** must be preserved and migrated
|
|
- **Relationship integrity** must be maintained throughout
|
|
|
|
### 2. Dependency Order
|
|
- Models must be updated before views/templates
|
|
- Foreign key relationships require careful sequencing
|
|
- pghistory integration adds complexity to migration order
|
|
|
|
### 3. Testing Requirements
|
|
- **429 lines of tests** need updates
|
|
- Integration tests across multiple apps
|
|
- Historical data integrity verification
|
|
|
|
### 4. URL Pattern Migration
|
|
- **22 URL patterns** need updates or removal
|
|
- Backward compatibility considerations
|
|
- Search engine optimization impact
|
|
|
|
## Risk Mitigation Requirements
|
|
|
|
### Database Safety
|
|
- **MANDATORY**: Full database backup before any migration steps
|
|
- **MANDATORY**: Dry-run testing of all migration scripts
|
|
- **MANDATORY**: Rollback procedures documented and tested
|
|
|
|
### Testing Strategy
|
|
- **Phase-by-phase testing** after each migration step
|
|
- **Full test suite execution** before proceeding to next phase
|
|
- **pghistory data integrity verification** at each checkpoint
|
|
|
|
### Deployment Considerations
|
|
- **Zero-downtime migration** strategy required
|
|
- **Backward compatibility** during transition period
|
|
- **Monitoring and alerting** for migration issues
|
|
|
|
## Implementation Readiness Assessment
|
|
|
|
### Prerequisites Complete ✅
|
|
- [x] Comprehensive codebase analysis
|
|
- [x] Dependency mapping
|
|
- [x] Risk assessment
|
|
- [x] Impact quantification
|
|
|
|
### Next Phase Requirements
|
|
- [ ] Detailed migration plan creation
|
|
- [ ] Migration script development
|
|
- [ ] Test environment setup
|
|
- [ ] Backup and rollback procedures
|
|
- [ ] Implementation timeline
|
|
|
|
## Conclusion
|
|
|
|
The company migration represents a **HIGH-RISK, HIGH-IMPACT** change affecting **300+ references** across the entire ThrillWiki codebase. The analysis confirms the migration is feasible but requires:
|
|
|
|
1. **Meticulous Planning**: Detailed phase-by-phase implementation plan
|
|
2. **Comprehensive Testing**: Full test coverage at each migration phase
|
|
3. **Data Safety**: Robust backup and rollback procedures
|
|
4. **Careful Sequencing**: Critical order of operations for safe migration
|
|
|
|
**Recommendation**: Proceed to detailed migration planning phase with emphasis on data safety and comprehensive testing protocols. |